- #Xbitlabs articles cpu display amd k10 full
- #Xbitlabs articles cpu display amd k10 code
- #Xbitlabs articles cpu display amd k10 Pc
When it works however it is clearly faster than a CPU. The CUDA app is buggy yes, of that there is no doubt.
#Xbitlabs articles cpu display amd k10 full
Yet again it appears that another marketing drive, full of lies is about to start. "Heureux, prospères sont les pauvres en esprit, car le royaume des cieux est àeux" Based on a small increase, you can guess what the final RAC is going to be over 2 or 3 days. It sound like you did not figure out the way the RAC is calculated yet. So what ? What about your promises?.Just bragging? If i take the top 1 position, do you agree to stop posting for a year? ( Nota Bene: We know the trick for gaining short term explosive RACs.)
#Xbitlabs articles cpu display amd k10 code
Please underwhelm us with your top-line RAC and then show the code that did it. Shameless marketing, speaking about the good, and only the good.Īnd as for "Farting in the wind", that must be a very French term! The question is whether AMD can ramp up their clock speed and fab to jump Intel's next offering. Looks like AMD are giving Intel a good race. Quite an interesting set of benchmarks tests for the Phenom II directly compared on clock speed to others. I expect more and more chips going bye bye, they are not designed to run for too long, see charlies articles on the inquirer about this. May be, we will see if it can make it to the Top 20. Let's be clear, the title of the thread is "Random Musings About the Value of CPUs vs CUDA", I have the right to say that the CPU is faster, because it is.īut if you were to equip a EVGA X58 3X SLI Core i7 Motherboard with three gtx 280 graphics cards the graphics cards would out perform the cpu cores. Using the same calculations as before, I got an idealised "CPU RAC" for the Q9300 of 2664, and a "Wall RAC" of 2591 - a loss of 2.7% to CUDA and system overhead. (But don't all rush at once - they're talking of starting S5R5 in the next day or two). Now that LHC has finally finished its mammoth work issue, I switched the two spare CPU cores to Einstein, to check out their new v6.10 application - I think it's the first time an SSE2 optimisation has been released as the stock app for Windows in the current S5R4 run. It's getting complicated to go back through them all and do the CUDA/CPU credit adjustments, so let's just leave the raw score as a nice round 3,700 credit per day. Although i really don't know, i would certainly hope that they beat the Intel Quad Cores.Random Musings About the Value of CPUs vs CUDAĭuring the second 24 hours (without any restarts, which probably helped), I got a CUDA credit award of 3347, plus 354 extra pendings.
![xbitlabs articles cpu display amd k10 xbitlabs articles cpu display amd k10](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/257910094_Performance_and_power_analysis_for_high_performance_computation_benchmarks/links/563d2e3c08ae8d65c01181c9/largepreview.png)
I couldn't say, apparently these Barcelona chips are 'native' Quad Core (whatever that means), so the performance is suppose to be better. That said, i don't really know if there would be any disadvantages because i don't know that much about it.Ĥ. The server based CPU's are usually much more stable than normal CPU's because they have lower clock speeds than the core can handle, making it good for overclocking, at least that's the theory. I can't think of any, in fact i can only see benefits from having it. I imagine some newer games will take advantage of multiple cores.ģ. As for multi core support, that will depend entirely on the game itself.
#Xbitlabs articles cpu display amd k10 Pc
I see absolutely no reason why you wouldn't be able to play any PC game with a Quad Core CPU, it will be no different than Intels Quad Core. I don't really know what socket it is, i imagine it will be AM2+, but it might be something like Socket F but i doubt it. <- See if you can fill out your PC spec's.